(Answered) PHI103 Week 4 – Quiz

PHI103 Week 4 – Quiz

Question 1

1 / 1 pts

Inference to the best explanation is often expressed in which invalid argumentative form?

 

Denying the antecedent

 

Correct!

 

Affirming the consequent

 

 

Denying the consequent

 

 

Affirming the antecedent

 

 

Question 2

1 / 1 pts

The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation:

 

Is the information published elsewhere?

 

Correct!

 

Does it provide the simplest explanation of the observed phenomena?

 

 

Is it likely to promote beneficial consequences?

 

 

Is it novel and innovative?

 

 

Question 3

1 / 1 pts

Suppose that the consequence that you predict from your hypothesis do not come true, under which circumstances can we reject the hypothesis?

 

If there is a probable connection between the hypothesis and its consequences

 

 

If there is no logical connection between the hypothesis and its consequences

 

 

 

If there is a deductively certain connection between the hypothesis and its consequences

 

 

You should never reject the hypothesis

 

 

Question 4

0 / 1 pts

This form of inductive argument moves from the specific to the general __________.

 

 

inductive generalization

 

 

statistical syllogism

 

 

argument from analogy

 

 

deductive argument

 

The answer can be found in Section 6.1, “Contrasting Deduction and Induction,” of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking.

 

Question 5

1 / 1 pts

Which of these is a limitation of inferences to the best explanation?

 

Most of reality cannot be explained

 

 

It will never be as convincing as deductive inference

 

 

 

It depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates

 

 

It generally leads us away from scientific explanations

 

 

Question 6

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is necessary in order for an explanation to be adequate?

 

It does not agree with other human knowledge

 

 

It provides an overly complex solution

 

 

 

It is noncircular

 

 

It is contradicted by other instances

 

 

Question 7

1 / 1 pts

The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation:

 

Is it something that could be doubted?

 

 

Are the results likely to get positive recognition?

 

 

Is it likely to be praised by the scientific community?

 

 

 

Is it testable?

 

 

Question 8

1 / 1 pts

Which one of the following is most likely not an inference to the best explanation?

 

“The sky is getting bright. It must be morning.”

 

 

 

“All dogs are mammals. So, Fido is a mammal.”

 

 

“It smells good; someone must be baking.”

 

 

“John is happy; he must have aced his test today.”

 

 

Question 9

1 / 1 pts

Which of these is one of the steps of the hypothetico-deductive method?

 

Interview other scholars first

 

 

Avoid things that would refute your theory

 

 

Determine whether the results are likely to be profitable

 

 

 

Test to find out if a predicted consequence occurs

 

 

Question 10

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is not one of the questions given for assessing a possible explanation?

 

Does it explain all relevant observations?

 

 

 

Does it follow validly from the premises?

 

 

Is it non-circular?

 

 

It is testable?

 

 

Question 11

1 / 1 pts

The concept of availability, when applied to inductive arguments (in Chapter 6) means what?

 

 

That sometimes the best evidence available lends itself more to inductive reasoning

 

 

The conclusions of inductive arguments are more available for scrutiny

 

 

Deductive arguments are less available because they are harder to formulate

 

 

Sometimes there is no evidence available to support a conclusion

 

 

Question 12

1 / 1 pts

The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation:

 

 

Does it agree well with the rest of human knowledge?

 

 

Does the conclusion follow validly from the premises?

 

 

Does it feel right?

 

 

Is it novel and innovative?

 

 

Question 13

1 / 1 pts

Using the rules for assessing inferences to the best explanation (in Chapter 6), which of the following is likely the best inference to the best explanation for the following observation:

“The tree that was in my front yard is gone.”

 

It changed into a blade of grass

 

 

 

Somebody cut it down

 

 

Aliens sucked it up into their space craft

 

 

It is gone because it disappeared

 

 

Question 14

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is true of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?

 

Deductive is always better than inductive

 

 

An inductive argument is generally fallacious

 

 

 

Deductive and inductive inference can be combined

 

 

Inductive reasoning is generally superior to deductive

 

 

Question 15

1 / 1 pts

Good explanations often can explain other phenomena. The name for this is __________.

 

explanatory power

 

 

 

fecundity

 

 

testability

 

 

falsifiability

 

 

Question 16

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is true about combining deductive and inductive reasoning?

 

One should never try to combine the two, but should make the best choice of which one to use.

 

 

If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally deductive.

 

 

The argument fails to adequately support its conclusion.

 

 

 

If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally inductive.

 

 

Question 17

1 / 1 pts

Using the rules for assessing inferences to the best explanation (in Chapter 6), which of the following is likely the best inference to the best explanation for the following observation:

“That magician apparently made a card that was in the deck appear in my back pocket.”

 

He is a sorcerer who can transport matter

 

 

 

He is using a clever trick to fool people

 

 

All reality is in our minds, and he can manipulate it

 

 

I have lost my mind

 

 

Question 18

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is true of the distinction between induction and deduction?

 

Inductive reasoning means going from the specific to the general; while deductive reasoning is the reverse.

 

 

Inductive reasoning means going from the general to the specific, while deductive reasoning is the reverse.

 

 

 

Some forms of inductive reasoning go from the specific to the general, while others go from the general to the specific.

 

 

Deductive reasoning never has a general conclusion.

 

 

Question 19

1 / 1 pts

Which of the following is true about inductive reasoning versus deductive reasoning?

 

Deductive reasoning is always preferable.

 

 

Inductive reasoning is always preferable.

 

 

 

Inductive reasoning is often preferable.

 

 

One should only use inductive reasoning if one can’t find a valid argument.

 

 

Question 20

1 / 1 pts

The concept of persuasiveness, when applied to inductive arguments (in Chapter 6) means what?

 

 

Sometimes deductively valid arguments are less persuasive than inductive arguments because one is not likely to accept their strong premises unless one already accepts their conclusions

 

 

Deductive arguments are always more persuasive because their reasoning, by definition, is stronger

 

 

Inductive reasoning is only persuasive to people who fail to notice that the conclusion does not follow from the premises

 

 

Deductive and inductive arguments are equally persuasive

 

Quiz Score: 20 out of 20

PHI103 Week 4 – Quiz Answer

Click the link below to buy a complete PHI103 Week 4 – Quiz Answer.