(Answered) Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

Purpose

This Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete their MSN EBP proposal.    This assignment includes the final sections of the proposal which are data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings.  (PO # 1)

CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve

healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies.  (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives

that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

For this assignment, the student will complete MSN EBP project proposal by including the final sections of data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

 Criteria for Content

  1. The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for exceedingthis length requirement.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference pages must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
  3. The paper should be presented in the following ordered sections:
  • Title Page
  • Data collection
  • Analysis
  • Evaluation
  • Dissemination of Results
  • Conclusion
  • References
  1. Data Collection: In this section, students provide a comprehensive and detailed description regarding how data are to be collected. The required content includes:
  2. For quantitative design the required content includes:
  • Restate the PICO/PICo question
  • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
  • Identify the data collection points
  • Explain the length of time for data collection
  • Explain all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic)
  • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
  1. For qualitative design the required content includes:
  • Restate the PICO/PICo question
  • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts)
  • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
  • Explain the data collection points
  • Explain the length of time for data collection
  • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation
  • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be used to enhance data quality
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
  1. Analysis: In this section, students provide a detailed explanation on how data will be analyzed.
  2. For quantitative data the required content includes:
  • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal
  • Describe one type of inferential statistics and their use in this EBP proposal
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
  1. For qualitative data the required content includes:
  • Explain how data analysis is organized
  • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal
  • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
  1. Evaluation: In this section, students will present information regarding methods useful to objectively determine if outcomes from implementing this proposed EBP proposal would be positive for stakeholders as well as the nursing practice area reflected in their specialty track.  The required content includes:
  • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project
  • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
  1. Dissemination of Results: In this section, students will identify specific methods that may be used to share the results from successful implementation of this EBP proposal.  The required content includes:
  • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders
  • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
  1. Conclusion: In this section, the student will identify a summary of their EBP project as well as consider the potential contribution to their specialty track practice setting. The required content includes:
  • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project
  • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting

Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection Answer

Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

Cervical cancer, the second most prevalent cancer among women globally, disproportionately affects women in developing countries due to insufficient screening tools and programs. Annually, around 500,000 new cervical cancer cases are reported worldwide, with 273,000 related deaths, primarily occurring in developing nations (Bray et al., 2018). Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection, often sexually transmitted, contributes significantly to cervical cancer development, emphasizing the importance of effective screening and early intervention (Wright et al., 2015).Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection

This MSN project proposes an investigation into the effectiveness of cervical screening in reducing cervical cancer incidences among women aged 21-65 years. The PICOT question guiding this research is: “In women between the ages of 21 and 65 years (P), does cervical cancer screening (I) compared to no screening (C) reduce the incidences of cervical cancer (O) within a 10-week period (T)?”

Data collection, a pivotal phase in this research, involves gathering accurate information through validated techniques to answer research questions and test hypotheses (Cohen et al., 2015). Both primary and secondary data collection methods will be employed to ensure the acquisition of information-rich and reliable data for subsequent statistical analysis. Primary data will be obtained through surveys and interviews, while secondary data will involve a comprehensive review of existing literature on cervical cancer screening methodologies, efficacy, and outcomes.Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection

Analyzing the collected data will be a meticulous process, utilizing statistical tools to draw meaningful conclusions. The evaluation phase will involve a critical assessment of the effectiveness of cervical screening in the targeted age group. The results will be disseminated through scholarly publications, presentations, and educational materials to reach a broad audience, including healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public.Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection

In conclusion, this MSN project aims to contribute valuable insights into the role of cervical screening in reducing cervical cancer incidences. By employing rigorous data collection, analysis, and evaluation methodologies, the study seeks to inform healthcare practices and policies, ultimately enhancing women’s health and well-being.Nr505 Week 7: Data Collection

References: Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394-424.

Cohen, L., Thompson, D., Yates, B., Zimmerman, L., & Pullen, C. (2015). Evaluation of nursing interventions (7th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.

Wright, T. C., Stoler, M. H., Behrens, C. M., Apple, R., Derion, T., & Wright, T. L. (2015). The ATHENA human papillomavirus study: design, methods, and baseline results. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(5), 542.