NR505 Week 6: Collaboration Cafe
NR505 Week 6: Collaboration Cafe. As you have learned this week in your lesson and reading, credibility of the results of your project are extremely important. In reviewing both statistical and clinical significance, which one of these do you feel is most important to your project and why?
NR505 Week 6: Collaboration Cafe Answer
Both statistical significance and clinical significance play pivotal roles in nursing research, particularly within the context of my project, as their impact is realized through meaningful changes in the patient population. Statistical significance becomes evident when study results indicate that the observed effect is unlikely to be a result of chance, considering the null hypothesis (Benjamin et al., 2018).
This significance allows researchers to draw meaningful conclusions about the studied patient population based on the collected data and findings (El-Masri, 2016). P-values and confidence intervals (CI) are commonly employed to assess statistical significance. P-values represent the probability that a specific outcome occurred by chance, assuming the equivalence of the new and control treatments to the null hypothesis (Benjamin et al., 2018). On the other hand, CI estimates the range within which the actual effect or outcome is likely to fall. NR505 Week 6: Collaboration Cafe
However, statistical significance alone is not sufficient; clinical significance is equally crucial. Clinical significance pertains to the practical relevance and impact of the observed results on patient care and outcomes (Furlan, Pennick, Bombardier, van Tulder, & Editorial Board, 2018). It goes beyond mere statistical values, delving into the meaningfulness of the findings in real-world healthcare settings. While statistical significance provides a level of confidence in the study’s results, clinical significance ensures that these results translate into tangible improvements in patient health, treatment approaches, or healthcare practices. NR505 Week 6: Collaboration Cafe
References: Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., … & Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6-10.
El-Masri, M. M. (2016). Understanding statistical significance. Journal of Surgical Research, 206(2), 494-496.
Furlan, A. D., Pennick, V., Bombardier, C., van Tulder, M., & Editorial Board, C. B. R. G. (2018). 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spinal Cord, 36(3), 226-237.
