NR535 Week 7: Case Study: Academic Integrity – Part 2
NR535 Week 7: Case Study. The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for learners to:
articulate key questions to be asked in a grievance;
review an academic integrity policy; and
determine a decision in a grievance process.
Course Outcome
CO 5: Examine professional ethical legal values in the role of the nurse educator. (PO 4)
Requirements
The Case Study has two parts. Each part of the Case Study will open and close on specific days of the week. There are to be a minimum of four total posts in this case study. For both Part I and Part II there is to be an initial post and a peer response. Each part has unique content requirements, and these are noted below.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
Case Study: Part II
Part II opens on Thursday of the week and close on Sunday of the week. In this part of the case study, you are to review a minimum of one academic policy for plagiarism from any nursing program. Once you have presented the policy and identified 3 key points related to this case, then you must determine a decision in the case. Note: To complete this part of the case study, please search for an academic integrity policy from any nursing program and use it in your discussion. Provide the web address of the policy and school. Additional details regarding the Case Study: Part II are noted in the Process section.
Process
Case Study: Part II
Part II will open on Thursday of the week and closes on Sunday of the week.
Requires an initial posting and a peer response
The content of the initial posting must include the following elements:
Presentation of one policy regarding plagiarism from any nursing program located in a college or university.
Identification of 3 key points related to this case study.
Summarize the entire situation regarding Larry Learner.
Summarize the entire situation regarding Eddie Educator.
Determine a decision for this case study.
The following information was determined during the committee meeting and you should consider this information in your 3 key points.
At the grievance hearing, Larry tells the committee that the faculty member who accused him of plagiarism is much younger and seems to be trying to “make a name for himself.” Larry told the faculty member that he has never had another faculty member identify plagiarism in his work.
Upon interviewing Larry Learner and Eddie Educator the committee discovers the following information:
Larry Learner admits he did not review the plagiarism policy but did sign the contract saying he will adhere to all policies.
Eddie Educator tells the committee that Larry had an issue with APA in an earlier assignment and was directed to see the writing tutor for help.
In an interview with Terri Tutor, she tells you that Larry never kept his appointment
Upon request, Eddie Educator presents both assignments to the committee for review. In the first assignment, the plagiarism detection program similarity score was 35%. In the second assignment, the plagiarism detection program similarity score was 37%.
Next Steps
The committee’s next step is to consider all the information and apply the policy for plagiarism (use the policy that you found).
Present the policy and identify three key points useful to this case.
A summary of the case study considering Larry Learner and Eddie Educator is required. Lastly, determine a decision for this case (i.e. will you uphold the expulsion or impose a different sanction)NR535 Week 7: Case Study
NR535 Week 7: Case Study Answer
Chamberlain University upholds a stringent policy on plagiarism, clearly outlined in the College of Nursing Student Handbook (2021). The policy encompasses several key points, serving as a comprehensive approach to maintain academic integrity:
Detection of Plagiarism through Turnitin Software:
Students acknowledge that their submissions, including discussions, papers, and other written assignments, are subject to plagiarism checks via anti-plagiarism software, such as Turnitin. This technological tool plays a pivotal role in identifying and preventing plagiarism within the academic setting.
Guidance by Terms and Conditions:
The utilization of anti-plagiarism software adheres to specified terms and conditions, emphasizing the importance of students reading and accepting these terms. This ensures transparency and a clear understanding of the rules governing the use of such software in maintaining academic honesty.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
Student Acknowledgment:
Students explicitly acknowledge that all their written works are susceptible to submission for plagiarism checks. This acknowledgment underscores the shared responsibility between the institution and its students to uphold academic integrity and deter any form of plagiarism.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
Larry the Learner’s Responsibility:
As a student, Larry recognizes and accepts that all his academic endeavors may undergo plagiarism scrutiny. It is incumbent upon Larry to produce original work, avoiding any form of copy-pasting or unauthorized use of external ideas without proper acknowledgment.
Furthermore, Larry is obliged to familiarize himself with and accept the terms and conditions delineated in the plagiarism policy and associated anti-plagiarism software, thus assuming liability in case of any plagiarism-related issues.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
Eddie the Educator’s Role:
Eddie, in his role as an educator, bears the responsibility of ensuring that students are well-versed in the plagiarism policy. This involves periodic reminders, educational initiatives to prevent plagiarism, and facilitating the submission of student work to anti-plagiarism software.
By actively promoting awareness and adherence to the policy, Eddie contributes to creating an academic environment characterized by integrity and a commitment to originality.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
