NR535 Week 7: Case Study: Academic Integrity – Part 1
NR535 Week 7: Case Study. The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for learners to:
articulate key questions to be asked in a grievance;
review an academic integrity policy; and
determine a decision in a grievance process.
Week 7 Case Study: Academic Integrity Assignment Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.)
Course Outcome
CO 5: Examine professional ethical legal values in the role of the nurse educator. (PO 4)
Total Points Possible: 50 (Each part is worth 50 points for an assignment total of 100)
Requirements
The Case Study has two parts. Each part of the Case Study will open and close on specific days of the week. There are to be a minimum of four total posts in this case study. For both Part I and Part II there is to be an initial post and a peer response. Each part has unique content requirements, and these are noted below.
Case Study: Part I
Part I of the case study opens on Sunday and will close on Wednesday of the week. You cannot add additional information to Part I once it closes on Wednesday. In this part of the case study, as chair of the Grievance Committee, you are beginning to gather information regarding a student grievance before the entire committee meets to consider the situation. To help you to gather information, you are to identify two questions for the student relevant to the grievance and two questions for the faculty member.
You need to include the rationale for each of these questions. Two scholarly articles supporting this part of the discussion are to be included in the initial post. These articles are to be related to a grievance procedure, academic integrity, and/or plagiarism. At least one of these articles must be from a peer-reviewed nursing journal. Additional details regarding the Case Study: Part I are noted in the Process section.
Process
Case Study: Part I
Opens on Sunday and closes on Wednesday.
Requires an initial posting and a peer response
You are the chairperson of the School of Nursing Grievance Committee. On Monday morning, you receive an e-mail from Larry Learner, who wants to file a grievance. He has been expelled from the nursing program due to plagiarism. You ask Larry to come to your office to discuss the potential grievance. During the meeting, Larry tells you he has always been an A student.
The content of the initial posting must include the following elements:
What are two questions you would ask Larry regarding plagiarism and what is the rationale for each of these questions?
What are two questions you would ask the faculty member and what is the rationale for each of these questions?
Support for your questions and rationales must come from scholarly literature. TWO references are required, and one must be from a peer-reviewed nursing journal.
NR535 Week 7: Case Study Answer
Week 7: Case Study: Academic Integrity – Part 1
To delve into the issue of plagiarism, posing specific questions to the learner is crucial in understanding the root causes and implementing targeted solutions (Díaz et al., 2018). The following inquiries can shed light on the circumstances:NR535 Week 7: Case Study
1. Why do you think you were caught with plagiarism?
Encouraging the learner to articulate their approach to completing the assignment unveils potential causes of plagiarism. Whether it was unintentional or due to collaboration, this question enables a nuanced understanding. In cases of inadvertent plagiarism, it signals a need for enhanced education on plagiarism prevention.
Conversely, intentional plagiarism prompts a discussion on the underlying motivations, accompanied by a clear communication of ethical and legal implications, potentially leading to appropriate consequences as determined by the committee.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
2. What measures would you have put in place to avoid plagiarism?
This question gauges the learner’s awareness of plagiarism prevention strategies employed during assignment completion. It serves to identify any gaps in the student’s knowledge regarding plagiarism awareness and mitigation approaches (Pàmies et al., 2020).
For example, in instances of unintentional plagiarism resulting from inadequate paraphrasing, it prompts a discussion on the importance of proper citation and paraphrasing techniques. The responses guide educators in tailoring interventions to enhance students’ understanding and application of plagiarism prevention measures.NR535 Week 7: Case Study
