NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café
NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café; You are part of an educational unit of four educators. The item analysis of the recent examination is being reviewed. During this process, one test question in particular upsets you. From the item analysis, you can see that the question has a discrimination index of .15 and several of the upper-level learners selected the same incorrect distractor. You believe that the distractor is worded poorly and is confusing to these students. You want to remove the item and give the students who missed it credit for the correct answer. You become upset when the majority of the educators vote to leave the test question within the examination. In fact, you become so upset that you raise your voice and the chair of the group calls for a 15-minute break for everyone “to calm down.”NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café
Later that night, while self-reflecting, you suddenly recall that as a student, you were upset over a test question that you thought was confusing and “tricky.” However, the faculty member would not change your score, resulting in you failing the exam. You realize that this experience has impacted your work as an educator in reviewing test questions. Tomorrow, you must work with the same group of individuals on a task force.
How would you approach tomorrow’s meeting? Would you bring up your memory to the members of the task force? Would you decide to discuss it in a few days over lunch? What actions would you use so that this previous event does not impact your current work? How would you be fair to the learners who answered correctly as well as to those who answered incorrectly?NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café
NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café Answer
In a situation like this, it is essential to acknowledge that disagreements over test item analysis can be quite common, given the diversity of opinions among educators. In the specific case at hand, I would approach the upcoming meeting with a proactive and reconciliatory mindset. My initial step would be to extend a sincere apology for any past misconduct, fostering a positive and collaborative atmosphere. Subsequently, I would delve into a comprehensive discussion of the test item in question, taking into consideration its discrimination index of .15.NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café
I would highlight the fact that several upper-level learners have chosen the same incorrect distractor, and the emotional impact this had on me. Furthermore, I would engage in a well-rounded conversation, considering the evidence-based advantages and disadvantages of retaining the item in its current form. This would encompass an examination of how this decision might influence the learners’ present scores and their future prospects as educators.NR537 Week 4: Collaboration Café
A crucial aspect of the discussion would be to approach the issue from the students’ perspective, emphasizing the stress and challenges they face when encountering test items with incorrect distractors. To underscore the significance of this perspective, I would draw upon my own personal experiences as a student, sharing my memories and the difficulties I encountered. By doing so, I aim to convey my ongoing concern about the difficulties students face when encountering such complex items in assessments.
