NR631 Week 3 Project Literature Review
NR631 Week 3 Project Literature Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide learners with the opportunity to integrate the knowledge and skills learned throughout the program, and to provide learners with the opportunity to communicate a scholarly project in a professional manner.
NR631 Week 3 Project Literature Requirements
Review any previous literature review you have completed related to your CGE project topic.If you have not previously completed a scholarly literature review on your topic (i.e., your topic may have changed), then you will create a new literature review with this assignment.Complete a database search on your project and compile the results, adding any new or relevant scholarly sources to your review. Focus on the most relevant articles or studies that address your problem or concern or discuss resolutions to the problem. Include any studies that do not support your projected resolution or take a different approach.In addition, search for systematic reviews about the problem or concern.Write a review of the literature or update your existing literature review using the following outline.
Comprehensive review of the current evidence-based literature from nursing and related disciplines as appropriate
Application of evidence-based literature to project
Analysis of the literature:whether it supports your resolution; alternative solutions; how existing literature affected your proposal
Using this outline will ensure that you are in compliance with Chamberlain’s reuse/repurpose policy. Be sure to reacquaint yourself with this policy or reach out to your instructor if you have any questions.
Preparing the Paper
Paper length: 5–8 pages, excluding reference and title pages
Minimum number of scholarly articles or studies: 15
Note: The required sources must meet the criteria of scholarly sources by Chamberlain University definition.
You may use other nonscholarly sources (i.e., web pages) but those will not count toward the 15 required.
APA format, sixth edition
Correct reference citation format
Reference page
NR631 Week 3 Project Literature Answer
Project Literature Review: Enhancing CHF Patient Outcomes through Comprehensive Discharge Plans
In the realm of project development, a thorough literature review serves as a cornerstone, enabling researchers to build on existing knowledge, avoid redundancy, identify gaps, and resolve conflicts in research (Grove, Gray, & Faan, 2019). This review focuses on articles related to the PICOT question: “In CHF patients (P), does the implementation of a comprehensive discharge plan (I) compared to standard care (C) decrease the 30-day readmission rate from the current 20% to 10% (O) over a 12-month period (T)?” The sections covered include current evidence-based literature, application of evidence-based literature, and literature analysis.
Current Evidence-Based Literature:
Following an exhaustive literature review, fifteen relevant articles addressing the PICOT question were selected. The first study by Jayakody et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review to assess the methodological quality and effectiveness of telephone-based follow-up interventions, either independently or in conjunction with other elements, in reducing 30-day readmission rates among individuals with diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cardiovascular diseases. Although the results were inconclusive, highlighting the need for further research, this study provides valuable insights into potential interventions.
The second study, an RCT by Cajanding (2017), aimed to determine the effectiveness of structured discharge planning managed by nurses on perceived functionality status, patient satisfaction, cardiac efficiency, and other relevant outcomes. This research contributes to the understanding of the impact of nurse-led discharge planning on various patient-centric factors.
Application of Evidence-Based Literature:
The insights gained from these studies will inform the development and implementation of a comprehensive discharge plan for CHF patients. Utilizing evidence-based practices, such as structured telephone follow-ups and nurse-led discharge planning, will be integral to crafting an effective intervention tailored to the unique needs of CHF patients.
Literature Analysis:
While the selected studies provide valuable perspectives, a nuanced analysis reveals the complexity of interventions and the necessity for tailored approaches in addressing 30-day readmission rates among CHF patients. The inconclusive nature of some findings underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy, integrating various components to achieve optimal outcomes.
In conclusion, this literature review sets the foundation for an evidence-based project, emphasizing the importance of tailored interventions in reducing 30-day readmission rates among CHF patients.
