LA2003: Prosecutorial Roles:
Differentiate between prosecutorial roles and decisions in the criminal justice system.
Written Response Submission Form
Your Name: First and last
Your E-Mail Address: Your email here
Instructions
Write your responses where it reads “Enter your response here.” Write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements indicated. Each item contains the rubric that will be used to evaluate your responses.
Item 1
Read the case studies found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution document.
For the first case study, addresses the following in 250 words:
- What decision would you make as the prosecutor? Be sure that your decision includes the following aspects of a prosecutorial decision:
- What is the actus reus, and level of mens rea (purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent), and is there concurrence?
- As the prosecutor, would you bring charges against the suspect or would you drop the charges?
- If you decide to charge a suspect or suspects, be sure to address the following: What would you charge them with and why? Would you consider offering a plea agreement? What sentence would you recommend?
- If you decide not to charge a suspect or suspects, explain how you came to this conclusion.
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
| 0
Not Present |
1
Needs Improvement |
2
Meets Expectations |
|
| Power in Criminal Law and Prosecutorial Roles (Case Study 1) | |||
| What decision would you make as the prosecutor? Be sure that your decision includes the following aspects of a prosecutorial decision:
● What is the actus reus, level of mens rea (purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent), and is there concurrence? ● As the prosecutor, would you bring charges against the suspect or would you drop the charges? ● If you decide to charge a suspect or suspects, be sure to address the following: What would you charge them with and why? Would you consider offering a plea agreement? What sentence would you recommend? ● If you decide not to charge a suspect or suspects, explain how you came to this conclusion.
LO1: Choose an appropriate prosecutorial decision based on a set of facts in a crime.
|
Response is not present.
|
The response identifies a prosecutorial decision that is not fully plausible or relevant and/or does not fully apply to the case study.
The decision does not address all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent, probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study, although they may not be relevant or applicable. |
The response identifies a plausible and relevant prosecutorial decision that applies to the case study.
The decision addresses all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent , probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study.
|
Item 2
Read the case studies found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution document.
For the second case study, addresses the following in 250 words:
- What decision would you make as the prosecutor?
- Explain why the decision is the most appropriate.
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
| 0
Not Present |
1
Needs Improvement |
2
Meets Expectations |
|
| Power in Criminal Law and Prosecutorial Roles (Case Study 2) | |||
| What decision would you make as the prosecutor? Be sure that your decision includes the following aspects of a prosecutorial decision:
● What is the actus reus, level of mens rea (purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent), and is there concurrence? ● As the prosecutor, would you bring charges against the suspect or would you drop the charges? ● If you decide to charge a suspect or suspects, be sure to address the following: What would you charge them with and why? Would you consider offering a plea agreement? What sentence would you recommend? ● If you decide not to charge a suspect or suspects, explain how you came to this conclusion.
LO2: Choose an appropriate prosecutorial decision based on a set of facts in a crime. |
Response is not present.
|
The response identifies a prosecutorial decision that is not fully plausible or relevant and/or does not fully apply to the case study.
The decision does not address all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent, probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study, although they may not be relevant or applicable. |
The response identifies a plausible and relevant prosecutorial decision that applies to the case study.
The decision addresses all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent, probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study.
|
Hire Fix My GPA to help you complete your online class
Item 3
Read the case studies found in the Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution document.
For the third case study, addresses the following in 250 words:
- What decision would you make as the prosecutor?
- Explain why the decision is the most appropriate.
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
| 0
Not Present |
1
Needs Improvement |
2
Meets Expectations |
|
| Power in Criminal Law and Prosecutorial Roles (Case Study 3) | |||
| What decision would you make as the prosecutor? Be sure that your decision includes the following aspects of a prosecutorial decision:
● What is the actus reus, level of mens rea (purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent), and is there concurrence? ● As the prosecutor, would you bring charges against the suspect or would you drop the charges? ● If you decide to charge a suspect or suspects, be sure to address the following: What would you charge them with and why? Would you consider offering a plea agreement? What sentence would you recommend? ● If you decide not to charge a suspect or suspects, explain how you came to this conclusion.
LO3: Choose an appropriate prosecutorial decision based on a set of facts in a crime. |
Response is not present.
|
The response identifies a prosecutorial decision that is not fully plausible or relevant and/or does not fully apply to the case study.
The decision does not address all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent, probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study, although they may not be relevant or applicable. |
The response identifies a plausible and relevant prosecutorial decision that applies to the case study.
The decision addresses all relevant aspects of making a prosecutorial decision, such as intent, probable cause, defense, etc.
The response supports the decision with evidence from the learning resources and examples from the case study.
|
Hire Fix My GPA to help you complete your online class
Item 4
Addresses the following in 250 to 300 words:
- Who has the most power in the criminal justice system—police, prosecutor, or magistrate?
- Using the resources found, provide two examples to support your response.
- Should the power held by the role you identified be shifted to another role? Explain why or why not.
Your Response
Enter your response here.
Rubric
| 0
Not Present |
1
Needs Improvement |
2
Meets Expectations |
|
| Power in Criminal Law | |||
| Who has the most power in the criminal justice system—police, prosecutor, or magistrate?
● Using the resources found, provide two examples to support your response.
LO4: Identify the most powerful role in the criminal justice system. |
Response is not present.
|
Response contains a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete identification of who has the most power in the criminal justice system. | Response provides a complete, clear, accurate, and resource-based identification of who has the most power in the criminal justice system. |
| Should the power held by the role you identified be shifted to another role? Explain why or why not.
LO5: Analyze the power associated with key roles in the criminal justice system.
|
Response is not present. | Response contains a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete analysis of the power associated with a key role in the criminal justice system. | Response provides a complete, clear, accurate, and resource-based analysis of the power associated with a key role in the criminal justice system. |
References
Provide a citation for each resource you used to write your response to this Assessment. The following citation has been provided as an example:
- Lippman, M. (2018). Contemporary criminal law concepts, cases, and controversies (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hire Fix My GPA to help you complete your online class
Mastery Rubric
In order to achieve mastery of this Competency, you must achieve a “2” on every rubric row in addition to meeting the additional expectation indicated in the Mastery Rubric.
| Mastery Rubric | No | Yes |
| Exceeds Expectations: Connections to Experience | ||
| Compares life experiences and academic knowledge to infer differences between and similarities to concepts/ theories/frameworks of fields of study. | Responses do not integrate professional knowledge and experience from the criminal justice discipline when applied to the reporting of crime, the application of crime statistics, and the perceptions between crime occurrence and crime statistics. | Responses integrate professional knowledge and experience from the criminal justice discipline when applied to the reporting of crime, the application of crime statistics, and the perceptions between crime occurrence and crime statistics. |
Hire Fix My GPA to help you complete your online class
Professional Skills Assessment
In this Competency Assessment, you will be assessed on the following Professional Skills: Written Communication. These skills count toward your achievement of the Competency and the Professional Skills.
| Written Communication: Write with clarity, coherence, and purpose. | |||
| 0
Not Present |
1
Needs Improvement |
2
Meets Expectations |
|
| LO1: Construct complete and correct sentences. (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills) | Sentences are incoherent and impede reader’s access to ideas. | Sentences are incomplete and/or include fragments and run-on sentences, limiting reader’s access to ideas. | Sentence structure effectively conveys meaning to the reader. |
| LO2: Demonstrate the effective use of grammar. and mechanics. (AWE 2; Sentence Level Skills) | Multiple inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics impede reader’s access to ideas. | Some inaccuracies in grammar and mechanics limit reader’s access to ideas. | Use of grammar and mechanics is straightforward and effectively conveys meaning to reader. |
| LO3: Create cohesive paragraphs with a clear central idea. (AWE 2; Paragraph Level Skills) | Paragraphs, or lack of paragraphs, impede reader’s access to ideas. | Construction of main idea and/or supporting paragraphs limit reader’s access to ideas. | Main idea and/or supporting paragraphs effectively convey meaning to reader. |
| LO4: Use supporting material to support a claim. (AWE 2; Use of Evidence) | Supporting materials are not present. | Supporting material is used inconsistently or inappropriately. | Supporting material is used to enhance meaning. Writing is appropriately paraphrased and uses direct quotes as applicable.
|
| LO5: Demonstrate appropriate essay level writing skills, providing transitions between an introduction, body, and conclusion. (AWE 2; Essay Level Skills) | Ideas are disorganized with no/poor transitions. | Ideas are loosely organized with unclear paragraphing and transitions. | Ideas are organized with cohesive transitions. |
| LO6: Identify sources. (AWE 2; Credit to source) | Sources are missing. | Writing inconsistently identifies or misrepresents sources. | Writing clearly identifies the source of non-original material and/or ideas. |
LA2003 Prosecutorial Roles Answer
As the prosecutor in the case of the Smith Family Shooting, I would charge Johnny with attempted murder. This is as a result of Johnny attempting to shoot his father Mr. Smith. Johnny is 19 years old, hence under the law, he is an adult. With the history of prior arrest for assault and a history of threatening his father with a knife, this provides a criminal intent, mens rea in this case. Mens rea is also supported by the fact that Johnny owns an unregistered gun. Under California gun laws, Johnny was not supposed to own a gun, considering he had an arrest record (Lippman, 2018). In this case, Johnny purposely and knowingly shot his father, with the intention of killing him, providing a strong criminal act, actus reus to prosecute this case
Hire Fix My GPA to help you complete your online class
